Menthe Fraiche by James Heeley bottle
James Heeley

Menthe Fraiche

4.0/5 · 902 votes Unisex 2006
Main accords
Where to buy
Love Menthe Fraiche?
Save it to your favourites and discover similar scents in the Nardinum app.
Get the app

Fragrance notes

Top notes
Heart notes
Base notes

Character

Longevity2.7/5
Sillage2.4/5
Day89
Night13
Summer100
Spring69
Fall13
Winter9
Our take

James Heeley’s Menthe Fraiche opens with a shock of bright, cold mint, like crushing a freshly picked leaf between your fingers on a sweltering afternoon. That brisk top note is quickly softened by bergamot’s citrusy sparkle, but the mint stays front and center, refusing to fade into a generic aromatic blur. As it settles, green tea and freesia step in, lending a delicate, almost translucent sweetness that keeps the composition from turning into a simple mouthwash accord. The dry down reveals Virginia cedar, a clean, slightly dry wood that anchors the green freshness without darkening it. The overall impression is of a single mint leaf floating in a glass of chilled green tea, crystalline and weightless.

This is an unabashedly natural, minimalist scent, executed with the precision of niche perfumery but wearing like a whisper. It is neither heavy nor sweet, just a cool, aromatic breeze. The numbers tell the real story: longevity clocks in at a meager 2.66 out of five, and sillage barely reaches 2.44, meaning this fragrance commits to its name. It is an intimate ghost, a scent for your own appreciation rather than a crowd announcement. For that reason, it is perfect for the office or a lazy summer picnic where you want to smell clean without broadcasting your presence. Who should skip it? Anyone who expects a mint bomb to roar or a perfume to last through a full workday. But for those who crave an authentic, fleeting moment of leafy freshness, Menthe Fraiche is a quiet joy, best worn on a hot, sunny afternoon when your skin can carry its delicate melody.

Smells similar

Built from the same materials — ranked by how unusual the shared notes are, not by how many.

More from James Heeley

All James Heeley →