Jasmin du Malabar by Rance 1795 bottle
Rance 1795

Jasmin du Malabar

4.0/5 · 123 votes Feminine 2011
Main accords
Where to buy
Love Jasmin du Malabar?
Save it to your favourites and discover similar scents in the Nardinum app.
Get the app

Fragrance notes

Top notes
Heart notes
Base notes

Character

Longevity3.8/5
Sillage2.9/5
Day94
Night26
Spring100
Summer54
Fall34
Winter26
Our take

Jasmin du Malabar opens with a jolt of tangerine and bergamot, citrus so bright it’s almost abrasive, but the jasmine quickly bulldozes through, thick and honeylike. That African orange flower in the heart is the real star here, it smothers the citrus into submission and turns the whole affair into a syrupy, candied white floral — sweet enough to make your teeth ache, yet utterly natural in its execution, like a jar of orange blossom honey left open on a sunlit sill. The mimosa base dusts everything with a faint, chalky powder, softening the sweetness into something almost cozy, but don’t expect any surprises: this is a linear, focused floral from nose Christian Carbonnel that knows exactly what it wants to be.

The numbers don’t lie: sillage is a whisper (2.86/5), so don’t expect to leave a room trailing a cloud of jasmine. Longevity is decent but not heroic, about average for a floral edp at 3.84. This is a fragrance for the woman who wants to smell like a bouquet arranged by a Victorian florist — pretty, safe, and unmistakably feminine. It’s mainstream in the best sense: easy to like, hard to offend, but also hard to remember. A spring daytime scent through and through, ideal for brunches, garden parties, or a crisp morning walk when you want to feel polished without shouting.

Who should skip it? Anyone craving depth, smoke, or a rebellious twist. This jasmine doesn’t stray into indolic territory, it stays clean and sweet, almost polite. Perfect for a bride on her wedding day, but if you prefer your florals with a blade, look elsewhere.

Smells similar

Built from the same materials — ranked by how unusual the shared notes are, not by how many.

More from Rance 1795

All Rance 1795 →