Red by Zhirinovsky bottle
Zhirinovsky

Red

3.5/5 · 13 votes Masculine 2012
Main accords
Where to buy
Love Red?
Save it to your favourites and discover similar scents in the Nardinum app.
Get the app

Fragrance notes

Notes

Character

Longevity3.8/5
Sillage3.3/5
Day100
Night20
Spring80
Fall80
Summer60
Winter0
Our take

Zhirinovsky Red presents a floral composition built for men who want flowers without softness. The blend brings together jasmine, ylang-ylang, and rose in a way that feels deliberate rather than decorative. White floral and yellow floral accords sit beside the rose, creating a profile that is bright and full rather than reserved. The sweetness is present but steady, supported by a woody base that keeps the flowers from floating without direction.

The scent feels active and open, suited to a walk under clear skies when the air is warm and the light is steady. It carries a mood that matches movement and daylight, where the floral notes stay present without weighing down the moment. The woody element gives it enough structure to feel grounded while the petals do the visible work. It does not try to be complex or mysterious, offering instead a clear floral character that stays consistent from the first impression to the last.

This is a fragrance for someone who enjoys prominent flowers and does not mind a sweet edge. It suits a wearer who wants a scent that feels bright and floral rather than dark or heavy. Those who prefer minimal sweetness or who avoid strong floral accords will likely find it too pointed for their taste. The rose and jasmine lead firmly, leaving little room for subtlety or restraint.

The overall impression is a sunny floral that stays true to its accords. The ylang-ylang adds a rich yellow tone while the rose keeps the heart of the blend familiar. Woody notes hold the sweetness in place so the fragrance remains structured. Zhirinovsky Red is a straightforward floral with a sweet, woody finish.

Smells similar

Built from the same materials — ranked by how unusual the shared notes are, not by how many.

More from Zhirinovsky

All Zhirinovsky →