Torino22 by Xerjoff bottle
Xerjoff

Torino22

4.3/5 · 1,869 votes Unisex 2022
Main accords
Where to buy
Love Torino22?
Save it to your favourites and discover similar scents in the Nardinum app.
Get the app

Fragrance notes

Top notes
Heart notes
Base notes

Character

Longevity3.8/5
Sillage3.1/5
Day91
Night73
Spring100
Fall88
Summer79
Winter57
Our take

Torino22 opens with a sharp, medicinal slap of eucalyptus and saffron, the latter adding a metallic shimmer that cuts through the bergamot’s citrus brightness. Within minutes, the mate leaf and clary sage arrive, bringing a dusty herbal bitterness that is distinctly arid, almost like crushed stems under a hot sun. The guaiac wood in the heart never fully sweetens, instead it stays smoky and dry, leaning into a camphor-like pungency that feels more industrial than cozy. On the dry down, the dry woods and a faint, clean musk hold the line, but the sillage stays close to the skin and the longevity hovers at moderate, a noticeable weakness for the price point.

This is a fragrance that conjures a specific image: a concrete terrace overlooking a Mediterranean hillside at dawn, where fresh-cut mint and diesel exhaust mingle in the cool air. It is not green in a pastoral sense, but it is intensely aromatic with a synthetic edge that keeps it from feeling entirely natural. The overall character is brisk and disciplined, more niche than mass appealing, with a metallic warmth from the saffron that can read as harsh if you prefer softer leathers or sweeter woods.

It suits someone who wants their freshness to have bite, perhaps for a crisp spring morning or a transitional fall day when the air still holds a chill. Skip it if you crave longevity, projection, or any hint of gourmand sweetness. This is a fragrance that performs best in the daylight hours, but even then, you will need to reapply. One spray and you are a glass of green tea with a whisper of iodine, interesting but fleeting. 🍃

Smells similar

Built from the same materials — ranked by how unusual the shared notes are, not by how many.

More from Xerjoff

All Xerjoff →