Oha (2023) by Teo Cabanel bottle
Teo Cabanel

Oha (2023)

2.8/5 · 36 votes Feminine 2023
Main accords
Where to buy
Love Oha (2023)?
Save it to your favourites and discover similar scents in the Nardinum app.
Get the app

Fragrance notes

Top notes
Heart notes
Base notes

Character

Longevity2.8/5
Sillage2.6/5
Day58
Night100
Fall100
Spring92
Winter83
Summer33
Our take

The opening breath carries bergamot bright enough to feel cold, softened immediately by a steeped tea note that smells like leaves left in the cup a little too long. Rose and jasmine rise through that haze, but the cardamom keeps them from floating away completely. This is not a fragrance that announces itself from a distance, nor does it vanish the moment the air changes. The patchouli in the base pulls the whole composition downward, giving it a grounded weight that suits a room where the lights have been lowered and the conversation has turned quieter.

Tonka bean adds a rounded warmth that sits close to the skin, moving with the body rather than projecting outward toward the corners of the space. White musk smooths the edges of the earthier notes, so the patchouli never feels rough or untreated. There is a balsamic trace that suggests polished wood and the faint heat of skin that has been warmed by an evening indoors. The citrus from the start has faded by now, leaving the spices and florals to carry the weight of the impression without any sharp interruptions.

It is a scent for someone who wants the room to notice the fragrance only when they lean in, not one that fills the air before the wearer arrives. The rose here is mature and paired with enough green earth to keep it from leaning sugary, while the tea note continues to whisper through the heavier base. Cardamom sparks against the darker woods in small, intermittent flashes, and the musk carries the tonka into a soft, lingering finish that keeps the patchouli from dominating the final impression entirely

Smells similar

Built from the same materials — ranked by how unusual the shared notes are, not by how many.

More from Teo Cabanel

All Teo Cabanel →